DoiT gave us the confidence to move from experimentation to production. They helped us understand the right way to build AI for the real world.
Milad Rezazadeh, CTO
Cloudability helped invent FinOps. Practicing it still means someone runs the fix.
IBM Cloudability — Apptio's flagship, acquired by IBM in 2023 — carries real pedigree: Apptio founded the FinOps Foundation, Business Mappings set the bar for enterprise chargeback, and Gartner placed IBM as a 2025 Magic Quadrant leader for cloud financial management. For allocation, budgeting, and finance-ready reporting, it's a heavyweight.
Cloud Intelligence™ goes further into execution — one platform, flat pricing. Composer tells you what to fix, CloudFlow runs the fix, PerfectScale right-sizes Kubernetes and data warehouses autonomously, PerfectScale for Commitments ladders Savings Plans and CUDs across AWS and GCP, and runtime attribution maps every dollar to the customer that drove it — no tagging, no ticket queue, and no percentage-of-spend fee.
Where the two platforms genuinely differ, and where Cloudability still earns its reputation. We try to be precise about both.
Cloudability's Business Mappings are the most mature allocation engine in enterprise FinOps: a declarative rules language that classifies cost to business units, applications, and cost centers, driven from ServiceNow CMDB data if you want a single source of truth. For finance-grade chargeback on a well-governed estate, it's the incumbent for a reason. But a rules engine can only work with the metadata it's given. A multi-tenant K8s cluster has one set of tags. A shared GPU serving fifty customers has one set of tags. Egress, NAT, cross-AZ — none of it is taggable at all. Gartner puts unit-level allocation under tag-based approaches at roughly 43% of cloud cost. The remaining 57% is exactly the spend finance keeps asking about. Runtime attribution is a first-class capability inside Cloud Intelligence™. A lightweight kernel-level sensor (eBPF) observes traffic and resource consumption directly on the host, and reconstructs which customer hit which inference endpoint, which team's job consumed which GPU-hour, and which workload generated which egress bytes.
Runtime cost attribution, no tagging required
Cloudability's optimization workflow is honest about its model: the rightsizing engine (with Turbonomic-powered "advanced" recommendations in the Premium tier) feeds policies that automatically open Jira issues or ServiceNow requests, and a Rightsizing ROI view tracks which tickets got actioned and what savings were realized. As recommendation-to-ticket pipelines go, it's the best-built one on the market. It's still a ticket pipeline. The recommendation lands in an engineer's queue, and the queue is exactly where cloud savings go to age. Automated execution exists at the edges — terminating orphaned resources, parking instances on schedules — but the core optimization loop ends in ITSM. CloudFlow is an execution layer. Visual where it should be, code-extensible where it has to be, with rollback safety and 40+ production templates. And Composer's 800+ recipes come with a policy editor: author your own against your own data, simulate them against historical periods, then enforce them in production. The finding becomes the action, not a ticket about the action.
// Production CloudFlows shipping today
Cloudability's commitment reporting and planning is genuinely strong — coverage, utilization, amortization, and purchase modeling that finance teams trust. And its Savings Automation module (from the Cloudwiry acquisition) does automate AWS Reserved Instance management, including term-flexible reservation strategies that manual purchasing can't match. The scope is the catch: automation centers on AWS RIs. Savings Plans, Azure, and GCP commitments get recommendations and planning tools — the buy decision and the follow-through are yours. PerfectScale for Commitments runs the buy decision across clouds. Hourly usage analysis across rolling windows. Laddered purchases across AWS Savings Plans, Database Savings Plans, and GCP CUDs. Approval thresholds, spend caps, pacing controls. Fully autonomous or approval-gated — included at flat pricing.
// The commitment scope
IBM acquired Kubecost in 2024, and Cloudability's Advanced Containers add-on is now Kubecost-powered: granular allocation by cluster, namespace, and workload, container rightsizing recommendations, and efficiency scoring. Solid telemetry with a strong open-source lineage. Two caveats. It's an add-on — container depth costs extra on top of a platform already priced as a percentage of your spend. And the loop still ends at recommendations routed into tickets; sustained rightsizing of requests and limits remains your engineers' recurring chore. PerfectScale for Kubernetes closes the loop in the base platform. Autonomous, workload-aware rightsizing at pod and container level, GPU utilization tracked separately, stability-first guardrails per environment. Customers typically see 30–50% K8s cost reductions.
// K8s capability split
Cloudability Governance (2025) added AI and GPU spend visibility — a real acknowledgment that AI is the fastest-growing line item on the bill. Combined with unit economics and business mapping, it tells you what your AI initiatives cost. What it doesn't do is make that number smaller. There's no inference pipeline auditing, no model or GPU rightsizing, and no per-customer attribution of AI spend on shared infrastructure. Data platforms follow the same pattern: cost visibility without warehouse-level optimization. Cloud Intelligence™ treats both as optimization surfaces. GenAI Intelligence tracks 9 AI providers and custom models — per-customer, per-feature, per-unit — while PerfectScale GenAI audits inference pipelines for waste and Composer recipes cover Bedrock cache effectiveness with remediation paths. PerfectScale for Snowflake automates warehouse rightsizing, idle suspension, and query efficiency with cost impact preview before commit.
// What's actually different
Look closely at the IBM execution story and it's assembled from acquisitions, each with its own SKU: Cloudability for visibility, Turbonomic for advanced rightsizing recommendations, Kubecost for containers, Cloudwiry for AWS RI automation, and IBM Consulting engagements to stitch the workflow together. Each piece is credible. The composite is a licensing exercise — tier gates (Essentials, Standard, Premium, Financial Planning), add-ons, and per-unit overage fees stack on top of the percentage-of-spend base. Cloud Intelligence™ ships visibility, allocation, anomaly detection, Composer recommendations, CloudFlow execution, PerfectScale workload optimization, and commitment automation as one platform at flat pricing. And instead of a consulting statement of work, DoiT includes Forward Deployed Engineers — engineers who write code in your environment: architecture reviews, K8s tuning, inference audits, on-call when production breaks.
// The stack you actually license
Cloudability prices as a percentage of the spend it manages — roughly 3.0% at $1M of annual cloud spend, tapering toward ~2.2% at $6M per the AWS Marketplace tiers — on annual contracts, with per-unit overage fees when you exceed your contracted spend cap ($1,650–$4,410 per unit depending on tier). Independent reviews peg it as rarely cost-effective below ~$3M in annual spend, and reference buyers reported 15–35% renewal increases after the IBM acquisition. The structural issue isn't any one number. It's that the fee is coupled to your bill, not your outcome: spend more, pay more — whether or not the savings materialize. DoiT is flat: platform pricing that doesn't scale with your bill, or bundled with multi-cloud procurement — DoiT resells AWS, GCP, and Azure at no markup, and consolidation often pays for the platform outright. No percentage of spend. No percentage of savings. No overage meter.
// Commercial model
No marketing categories. The questions FinOps practitioners actually ask when evaluating. Sourced from public documentation on both sides.
| Capability | Cloud Intelligence™ | Cloudability |
|---|---|---|
| // Attribution & allocation | ||
| Cost allocation across multi-cloud, K8s, data platforms, AI | Native Out-of-the-box, multi-method: usage %, utilization, shared cost spreads. | Business Mappings Declarative rules engine with ServiceNow/CMDB integration; the enterprise chargeback benchmark. |
| Tagless / runtime cost attribution | Native Kernel-level telemetry (eBPF). No tagging or mapping rules required. | Rule-based only Business Mappings infer from tags and metadata; cannot observe runtime traffic. |
| Per-customer COGS without tagging | Native Runtime customer-identifier observation in the request stream. | Via mappings + unit economics Requires authored rules and identifiable metadata. |
| Network cost attribution (egress, NAT, cross-AZ) by workload | Native Workload-level attribution from observed runtime traffic. | Aggregate / tag-inferred |
| // Workload optimization | ||
| K8s cost allocation (pod / namespace / cluster) | Native | Kubecost-powered Advanced Containers add-on (extra cost). |
| K8s autonomous rightsizing (pod, container, GPU) | PerfectScale Workload-aware, stability-first, autonomous execution. Typical reduction 30–50%. | Recommendations Kubecost container sizing recs routed to tickets; no autonomous execution. |
| Snowflake optimization (warehouse + query + idle) | PerfectScale for Snowflake Automated rightsizing, idle suspension, query efficiency. | Cost visibility No warehouse rightsizing or query tuning. |
| Databricks optimization | Visibility, Insights & Optimization | Cost visibility |
| AI / LLM cost visibility | 9 AI Providers & Custom Models per-customer, per-feature, per-unit | Cloudability Governance AI & GPU spend visibility (2025); no per-customer attribution. |
| AI workload optimization (inference, GPU, model selection) | PerfectScale GenAI + Composer | Visibility only |
| // Commitments & rate optimization | ||
| Autonomous commitment purchasing — cloud coverage | AWS + GCP SPs, DBSPs, and Compute Engine CUDs. Laddered, hourly-usage validated, autonomous or approval-gated. | AWS RIs only Savings Automation (ex-Cloudwiry) automates AWS RI management. Savings Plans, Azure, GCP: recommendations and planning only. |
| Commitment modeling & amortization reporting | Unified, multi-cloud | RI/SP planning suite Mature coverage, utilization, and amortization reporting. |
| Cost of commitment automation | Included Flat platform pricing. 0% of savings taken as fees. | Tier/add-on gated On a platform priced at ~2.2–3% of managed spend with per-unit overages. |
| // Intelligence & automation | ||
| Anomaly detection | Real-time, with topology context | ML-driven Email and Slack alerting. |
| Curated recommendations engine | Composer — 800+ recipes With custom policy editor + historical simulation. | Rightsizing engine Basic + Turbonomic-powered advanced recs (Premium tier). |
| Custom policy authoring with historical simulation | Native Author, simulate against history, then enforce. | Threshold policies → tickets Savings-threshold triggers for Jira/ServiceNow; no historical simulation. |
| Agentic AI assistant | FinOps AI | Not available |
| MCP server for LLM access to cost data | Native | Not available |
| Infrastructure-level automation / remediation | CloudFlow Executes changes today. Visual + code, 40+ templates, rollback safety. | Edge automation Orphaned-resource termination, resource parking; core optimizations route to ITSM tickets. |
| Architecture / resource graph with cost overlay | Cloud Diagrams Live topology with cost + performance overlays. | Not available |
| // Integrations | ||
| Cost source / billing data ingestion | Broad coverage AWS, GCP, Azure, K8s, Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Datadog, MongoDB, OpenAI, Anthropic, more. | Broad cloud coverage AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, IBM Cloud, K8s, on-prem estates. |
| Ticketing & work-tracking integrations | Jira, Asana, GitHub Issues | Jira, ServiceNow Deep policy-driven ticket automation with ROI tracking. |
| Comms integrations | Slack, Teams, Discord, Gmail | Slack, email |
| Incident management integrations | PagerDuty | Not available |
| General workflow automation | Zapier (2,000+ apps) + Platform APIs | APIs No app-level automation fan-out. |
| // Procurement, pricing & experts | ||
| Multi-cloud procurement / billing | Optional cloud procurement, no markup AWS / GCP / Azure. Bundled platform access. | Platform only |
| Pricing model | Flat / bundled No percentage-of-spend fees anywhere. | % of managed spend ~2.2–3% on annual contracts; per-unit overage fees ($1,650–$4,410) above contracted cap. |
| Included expertise | Forward Deployed Engineers Write code in your environment. K8s tuning, inference audits, incident response. | IBM Consulting Implementation and managed FinOps sold as separate engagements. |
| Time to first realised savings | Days Out-of-the-box recipes fire on connect; execution engines act on them. | Weeks–months; you implement Mapping/report setup first; recommendations are engineering work to realize (except AWS RIs). |
DoiT gave us the confidence to move from experimentation to production. They helped us understand the right way to build AI for the real world.
Milad Rezazadeh, CTO
Attribute™'s cost grouping technology took our cost visibility and allocation to a whole new level. Now, our teams are fully accountable for their budgets, significantly improving our cloud efficiency and helping us minimize unnecessary costs.
Eli Zilbershtein, Head of DevOps, Hippo
You can't tag a customer in a multi-tenant environment. Attribute™ finally shows us what each customer costs and what's driving those costs.
Omri Cohen, Director of Engineering, Platform
Attribute™'s data is truly unmatched. No other solution on the market could deliver the precise customer cost and usage profiles we needed in such a complex infrastructure. Within weeks, the data from Attribute™ transformed our understanding of cost structures, influencing key strategic decisions in pricing, renegotiations, and market positioning.
Jonathan Langer, COO, Claroty
Attribute™ simplified tracking customer costs in our multi-tenant environments. Customer cost measurement is now clear and standardized, and finance gets the business context they need. Integration was quick and required no changes.
Kfir Lippmann, CFO, Salt Security
Attribute™ translates complex cloud bills into actionable, business-centric insights that empower our engineering teams to take true ownership of their costs.
Balamurugan Mohandossgandhi, Head of IT and Infrastructure, PropertyGuru
This has let us get a better idea of what our cost of goods sold really is. It's not every day you come across something that delivers value as quickly as yours did for us. I was seeing useful insights inside the POC, and we had only deployed it to a couple of real clusters.
Jason Moore, Principal DevOps Engineer, Accrete AI
Eliminating the need to tag thousands of resources has freed up my team and we've invested our efforts in enhancing our platform significantly.
Ziv Sivan, VP of Engineering
Yes. IBM Cloudability is an enterprise FinOps platform centered on visibility, allocation, and financial planning — Business Mappings for chargeback, budgets and forecasting, anomaly detection, rightsizing recommendations, and commitment planning. Cloud Intelligence™ covers that ground, then goes further into execution: infrastructure remediation (CloudFlow), autonomous workload optimization (PerfectScale for Kubernetes and Snowflake), commitment automation across AWS and GCP (PerfectScale for Commitments), runtime cost attribution without tagging, and Forward Deployed Engineers included in the platform.
Where the loop closes. Cloudability's optimization workflow ends in a ticket — its policy engine opens Jira or ServiceNow requests from rightsizing recommendations, and your engineers implement them. DoiT closes the loop in the platform: CloudFlow executes infrastructure changes, PerfectScale rightsizes workloads autonomously, and commitments are purchased automatically across AWS and GCP. Pricing follows the same split: Cloudability charges a percentage of the spend it manages; DoiT is flat.
Apptio (Cloudability's parent) was acquired by IBM in 2023 for approximately $4.6B, and IBM has kept investing: Kubecost was acquired in 2024 and now powers the Advanced Containers add-on, and 2025 brought Cloudability Governance for AI and GPU spend visibility. IBM placed as a leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Cloud Financial Management Tools. The flip side reported by reference customers: renewal pricing hardened after the acquisition, with 15–35% increases reported in 2025, and advanced capabilities increasingly sit behind tier gates and add-on SKUs.
Partially, centered on AWS Reserved Instances. The Savings Automation module (from the Cloudwiry acquisition) automates AWS RI management, including term-flexible reservation strategies. Savings Plans, Azure, and GCP commitments get recommendations and planning tools — execution is manual. PerfectScale for Commitments ladders Savings Plans, Database Savings Plans, and Compute Engine CUDs across AWS and GCP — autonomous or approval-gated, validated continuously against hourly usage — included at flat pricing.
Cloudability prices as a percentage of the cloud spend it manages, on annual contracts: roughly $30,000/year for up to $1M of spend (~3.0%), tapering to ~2.2% at $6M, per its AWS Marketplace tiers. Exceeding your contracted cap triggers per-unit overage fees ($1,650–$4,410 depending on tier), and independent reviews suggest the platform is rarely cost-effective below ~$3M in annual cloud spend. DoiT is flat: platform pricing that doesn't scale with your bill, or bundled with multi-cloud procurement — DoiT resells AWS, GCP, and Azure at no markup, and many teams find consolidation effectively pays for the platform.
Cloudability's container story is Kubecost-powered (IBM acquired Kubecost in 2024): the Advanced Containers add-on provides granular allocation by cluster, namespace, and workload, plus container rightsizing recommendations. It's an add-on with extra cost, and recommendations route into tickets rather than executing. PerfectScale for Kubernetes executes autonomous, workload-aware rightsizing at pod and container level with GPU tracking and stability-first guardrails, in the base platform. Customers typically see 30–50% K8s cost reductions.
At the edges. Cloudability can automatically terminate orphaned resources and park instances on schedules, and its policy engine automatically creates Jira issues or ServiceNow requests from rightsizing recommendations — with a Rightsizing ROI view tracking realized savings. The core optimization loop still ends in a human queue. DoiT CloudFlow is a full execution layer — visual plus code-extensible, 40+ production templates, rollback safety — that turns Composer findings into executed changes.
With DoiT, yes. Runtime cost attribution in Cloud Intelligence™ uses kernel-level telemetry (eBPF) to observe actual traffic and resource consumption, mapping every dollar to the customer, feature, team, or AI agent that drove it — no tagging required. Cloudability's Business Mappings are the classic enterprise alternative: a declarative rules engine over tags, metadata, and CMDB data. They're excellent where metadata is disciplined, but shared clusters, shared GPUs, and multi-tenant endpoints stay opaque because the metadata doesn't carry the answer.
Cloudability Governance (2025) added AI and GPU spend visibility, folding AI costs into its allocation and unit-economics framework — genuinely useful for reporting what AI initiatives cost. DoiT goes past reporting: GenAI Intelligence tracks 9 AI providers and custom models per-customer, per-feature, per-unit; PerfectScale GenAI audits inference pipelines for waste (token reduction, model selection, GPU rightsizing); and runtime attribution ties AI spend on shared infrastructure to the customer or feature that drove it — something tag- and rule-based allocation can't see.
Not as a product capability today — Cloudability's 2025 investments went into AI spend governance (visibility over your AI costs) rather than an agentic assistant over its own data. DoiT ships FinOps AI, an agentic assistant, plus an MCP server so you can query your cost data from Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM client — wired into execution engines that can run the fix, not just describe it.
Large enterprises whose center of gravity is financial management: mature chargeback across complex org structures via Business Mappings, ServiceNow/CMDB-driven allocation governance, cloud financial planning tied to broader IBM/Apptio TBM practices (ApptioOne), and organizations already invested in IBM Consulting relationships. If your FinOps practice is primarily allocation, budgeting, and finance-ready reporting — and engineering owns implementation through ITSM workflows — Cloudability is a credible, Gartner-recognized incumbent. The fit weakens when you need autonomous execution, multi-cloud commitment automation, data platform or AI optimization, per-customer attribution on shared infrastructure, or pricing decoupled from your cloud bill.